CaliforniaSchoolsTerra Linda High

Terra Linda High

PublicRegular
San Rafael, California · San Rafael City High
Teachers58.0FTE
Ratio20.8:1students per teacher
Students1,205enrolled
SCHOOL SNAPSHOT
Students1,205
Grade Span9–12
Student:Teacher20.8:1
Free/Reduced Lunch50%
Title INo
SectorPublic
Visit school website →
Student : Teacher
20.8:1
0.0%vs prior yrUS avg 15.4:1
Teacher FTE
60
3.4%vs prior yr
Enrollment
1,248
3.6%vs prior yr
Years of Data
5
2020–2024
Counselors
1:416
5.3%vs prior yrASCA max 1:250
Nurses
1:4,988
25%vs prior yrNASN max 1:750
Psychologists
1:1,247
43.2%vs prior yrNASP max 1:500
Social Workers
SSWAA max 1:250
Trends & 5-year history below

Pupil : Teacher Ratio — 5-Year Trend

14.9:116.3:117.6:118.9:120.2:121.6:12020202120222023202421.1:120.3:120.9:120.8:120.8:1Terra Linda HighUS public-school avg

Enrollment & Teacher FTE

1,1841,1981,2121,2251,2391,253575758596060202020212022202320241,2471,2001,1891,2051,2485959575860EnrollmentTeacher FTE

Year-by-year workforce

Metric20202021202220232024Nat Avg
Enrollment1,2471,2001,1891,2051,248
Teacher FTE5959575860
Pupil : Teacher ratio21.1:120.3:120.9:120.8:120.8:115.4:1

What These Numbers Mean

Teacher FTE

Full-Time Equivalent counts part-time teachers proportionally. One full-time teacher = 1.0 FTE; two half-time teachers also = 1.0 FTE. This is the standard federal reporting unit.

Pupil : Teacher ratio

NCES-reported ratio divides total enrollment by teacher FTE. It is NOT the same as average class size — schools with specialists, coaches, and resource teachers will show lower ratios than typical class sizes.

How to read the trend

A falling pupil:teacher ratio (line going down) means more staffing per student — generally a positive signal. A rising line can indicate budget pressure or fast enrollment growth outpacing hiring. Always compare to the US average (dashed grey).

Historical data spans 20202024 from NCES CCD.

Student Support & Wellbeing

Non-teaching staff who support student mental health, physical health, and behavioural needs. Lower pupil-to-staff ratios mean more one-on-one access.

Counselors & Social Workers — staff to pupils (recommended 1:250)

1:01:951:1901:2841:3791:4742015201720201:4391:4391:416Counselor : PupilsSocial Worker : PupilsRecommended 1:250

Nurses & Psychologists — staff to pupils

1:01:1,0771:2,1551:3,2321:4,3101:5,3872015201720201:3,9911:4,9881:2,6341:2,1951:1,247Nurse : PupilsNASN 1:750Psychologist : PupilsNASP 1:500

Support staffing & ratios — year by year

Metric201520172020Nat Avg
Counselors (FTE)333
Nurses (FTE)00.30.3
Psychologists (FTE)0.50.61
Social Workers (FTE)000
Counselor : Pupils1:4391:4391:4161:250
Nurse : Pupils1:3,9911:4,9881:750
Psychologist : Pupils1:2,6341:2,1951:1,2471:500
Social Worker : Pupils1:250

Why these ratios matter

Counselors (ASCA 250:1)

School counselors support academic planning, college & career readiness, and social-emotional wellbeing. The American School Counselor Association recommends no more than 250 students per counselor.

Nurses (NASN 750:1)

School nurses manage chronic conditions, medications, immunisations, and emergencies. The National Association of School Nurses recommends at least 1 full-time nurse per 750 students (more for high-need populations).

Psychologists (NASP 500:1)

School psychologists assess learning & behavioural needs, run mental-health interventions, and coordinate special-education services. NASP recommends 500:1 or lower.

Social workers (SSWAA 250:1)

School social workers bridge home-school relationships, address attendance & trauma, and connect families to community resources. SSWAA recommends 250:1.

Source: US Dept of Education CRDC (20152020) — Civil Rights Data Collection.