CaliforniaSchoolsLa Habra High

La Habra High

PublicRegular
La Habra, California · Fullerton Joint Union High
Teachers83.0FTE
Ratio23.8:1students per teacher
Students1,977enrolled
SCHOOL SNAPSHOT
Students1,977
Grade Span9–12
Student:Teacher23.8:1
Free/Reduced Lunch63%
Title INo
SectorPublic
Visit school website →
Student : Teacher
23.8:1
0.0%vs prior yrUS avg 15.4:1
Teacher FTE
79
4.8%vs prior yr
Enrollment
1,881
4.9%vs prior yr
Years of Data
5
2020–2024
Counselors
1:519
4.9%vs prior yrASCA max 1:250
Nurses
1:2,077
NASN max 1:750
Psychologists
1:865
47%vs prior yrNASP max 1:500
Social Workers
SSWAA max 1:250
Trends & 5-year history below

Pupil : Teacher Ratio — 5-Year Trend

14.7:116.8:119.0:121.1:123.3:125.4:12020202120222023202424.4:124.2:124.7:123.8:123.8:1La Habra HighUS public-school avg

Enrollment & Teacher FTE

1,8651,9111,9562,0022,0472,093798081838485202020212022202320242,0772,0342,0541,9771,8818584838379EnrollmentTeacher FTE

Year-by-year workforce

Metric20202021202220232024Nat Avg
Enrollment2,0772,0342,0541,9771,881
Teacher FTE8584838379
Pupil : Teacher ratio24.4:124.2:124.7:123.8:123.8:115.4:1

What These Numbers Mean

Teacher FTE

Full-Time Equivalent counts part-time teachers proportionally. One full-time teacher = 1.0 FTE; two half-time teachers also = 1.0 FTE. This is the standard federal reporting unit.

Pupil : Teacher ratio

NCES-reported ratio divides total enrollment by teacher FTE. It is NOT the same as average class size — schools with specialists, coaches, and resource teachers will show lower ratios than typical class sizes.

How to read the trend

A falling pupil:teacher ratio (line going down) means more staffing per student — generally a positive signal. A rising line can indicate budget pressure or fast enrollment growth outpacing hiring. Always compare to the US average (dashed grey).

Historical data spans 20202024 from NCES CCD.

Student Support & Wellbeing

Non-teaching staff who support student mental health, physical health, and behavioural needs. Lower pupil-to-staff ratios mean more one-on-one access.

Counselors & Social Workers — staff to pupils (recommended 1:250)

1:01:1181:2361:3541:4721:5902015201720201:5461:5461:519Counselor : PupilsSocial Worker : PupilsRecommended 1:250

Nurses & Psychologists — staff to pupils

1:01:1,1791:2,3591:3,5381:4,7171:5,8972015201720201:5,4601:2,0771:1,1931:5901:865Nurse : PupilsNASN 1:750Psychologist : PupilsNASP 1:500

Support staffing & ratios — year by year

Metric201520172020Nat Avg
Counselors (FTE)444
Nurses (FTE)0.401
Psychologists (FTE)1.83.72.4
Social Workers (FTE)000
Counselor : Pupils1:5461:5461:5191:250
Nurse : Pupils1:5,4601:2,0771:750
Psychologist : Pupils1:1,1931:5901:8651:500
Social Worker : Pupils1:250

Why these ratios matter

Counselors (ASCA 250:1)

School counselors support academic planning, college & career readiness, and social-emotional wellbeing. The American School Counselor Association recommends no more than 250 students per counselor.

Nurses (NASN 750:1)

School nurses manage chronic conditions, medications, immunisations, and emergencies. The National Association of School Nurses recommends at least 1 full-time nurse per 750 students (more for high-need populations).

Psychologists (NASP 500:1)

School psychologists assess learning & behavioural needs, run mental-health interventions, and coordinate special-education services. NASP recommends 500:1 or lower.

Social workers (SSWAA 250:1)

School social workers bridge home-school relationships, address attendance & trauma, and connect families to community resources. SSWAA recommends 250:1.

Source: US Dept of Education CRDC (20152020) — Civil Rights Data Collection.